Football teams still had a home advantage during the pandemic, although fans are not allowed to go into the stands

  • The researchers compared games that were played without fans due to Covid with other seasons
  • Found home team receives fewer favors from the referee, but still has home advantage
  • However, the home advantage is less important than when the fans are in the stands

According to a study, soccer teams that played games during the pandemic achieved a home advantage even though no fans were allowed in the stadiums.

But while a team’s home turf gave them an advantage over the opposition, the advantage was less than in a pre-Covid world where spectators were allowed to watch.

Researchers from Germany looked at more than 1,000 professional games that took place without fans and rated how the pandemic changed the game.

They found that the home advantage persisted at the pro level even though the fans were banned, but the beneficial relationship was seen at the amateur level as well.

Scroll down for video

According to a study, soccer teams that played games during the pandemic achieved a home advantage even though no fans were allowed in the stadiums. The data comes from ten top European leagues, including the English championship

The researchers analyzed the in-game statistics to calculate the impact of the Covid restrictions on home advantage, red and yellow cards, number of shots per game, and comparing games with bookmakers’ predictions.

The data comes from ten top European leagues: England’s championship and Premier League, Spain’s La Liga and La Liga 2, Italy’s Serie A and B, the German Bundesliga and Bundesliga 2 as well as the best Portuguese and Turkish leagues.

It turned out that in the absence of spectators, the likelihood of a referee booking or sending off a home team player was dramatically higher than in Covid games.

“This is clear evidence that referees’ prejudices disappear completely or even slightly reverse in empty stadiums,” the researchers write.

The study also found that the style of play has changed as games have been played without spectators, with both home and away teams playing equally as attack styles.

Historically, away teams play a more defensive style of football, but this was not the case during the Covid-hit season.

While a team’s home turf gave them an advantage over the opposition, the advantage was less than in a pre-Covid world where spectators were allowed to watch

Goalkeepers save LESS a free kick when they have a “wall” in front of them

According to new research, a goalkeeper is less likely to save a free kick if a wall of players is in the way.

The 10 yard side-by-side barrier makes it difficult for the free kick taker to score. This technique has now been called into question.

Researchers at Queen’s University in Belfast found that the wall affected the goalkeeper’s eyesight and slowed reaction time.

The goalkeeper’s view is blocked for around 200 milliseconds and the reaction time is up to 90 milliseconds slower than without a wall.

As a result, the researchers reckon that if the wall is in place, the goalkeeper is 13 percent less likely to save successfully.

“The most important result of the study shows a clear advantage for the home team, which persists even in games without the presence of their fans,” write the researchers in their study, which was published today in PLOS ONE.

This was confirmed by looking at betting odds, which give a direct view of how the market rates home advantage in games with and without spectators.

Co-author Fabian Wunderlich, also from the German Sport University, said: “We know from numerous studies that the betting market rarely goes wrong.

“In addition, betting odds have the advantage that, in contrast to real results, they are less susceptible to random influences.”

Traditionally in European football around half of the games end as home wins, a quarter are draws and the rest are away wins.

The reasons often cited are the direct influence of the fans on referee decisions and the more offensive style of play of the home team, which is driven by the fans.

However, a study of amateur games has shown that the phenomenon of home advantage also applies to leisurely football.

Co-author Prof. Matthias Weigelt from the University of Paderborn in Germany said: “We also looked at almost 6,000 games from the district league A and found that the home advantage not only applies to professionals but also to recreational footballers, although it rarely, if at all , full booths and loud singing fans can enjoy. ‘

According to scientists, how to get the perfect penalty EVERY time

They think it’s all over, and it could be now that scientists have figured out the best way for soccer players to train to receive the perfect penalty.

According to the latest research, waiting for the goalkeeper to move and aim at the opposite corner is a skill that can be improved through training.

While Alan Shearer’s tried and true technique of kicking the ball into the top corner might work for some, scientists claim that strikers can train themselves to outsmart the goalkeeper better.

Simple methods can be used to shorten a soccer player’s decision-making process and allow them to focus more on shooting accuracy, researchers say.

Before the Premier League kick-off, the University of Portsmouth looked at the penalty mechanics that will see former champions Manchester United and Leicester City hit the pitch at Old Trafford.

The latest research carried out by Dr. Martina Navarro, a lecturer in sports and exercise science, could help the penalties.

Dr. Navarro said: “A successful penalty kick requires the penalty taker to take an accurate, well-controlled kick while observing the goalkeeper and making a decision on which side to kick the ball.

In other words, it is a defining characteristic of goalkeeping strategy that a conscious decision is made when kicking.

“This essentially makes the goalkeeping strategy a double task.”